Sunday, July 1, 2012
'Greening Punjab' campaign launched today
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Rs 276 cr, eight years and yet no train from Abohar to Fazilka
TRIBUNE EXCLUSIVE
Residents suffer as official apathy denies vital rail link between Punjab towns
- Abohar-Fazilka Rail Link
- Project started: Feb 1, 2004
- Length of track: 42.11 km
- New stations: 5
- Level crossings: 29
- Original cost: `86 crore
- Actual cost: `276 crore
- Original deadline: 2007
- New deadline: July 31, 2012
Friday, June 22, 2012
Waterlogging ensures farmers' money, efforts go down drain
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Chandigarh set to get Metro
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Time to push the reverse gear - GoI Monitor, My Article
Time to push the reverse gear
India is widening roads and building flyovers to pamper car owners while the world is going for traffic-free ways and public transport
Our roads cater to all kinds of vehicles unlike the homogeneous traffic of Western countries. Image: Wikicommons
INDIA'S NATIONAL transport policy says there should be socially equitable distribution of space on roads but as is quite evident, we are biased towards motor vehicles. For a country like us, number of people transported is much more important than number of vehicles transported. By that standard, most of our highways are unconstitutional. We have only 18 four wheelers per 1,000 persons, which is much less when compared with US (809) and Germany (554). However, that does not stop us from importing their designs for our roads, thus, inviting disaster. Since the western road designs are for homogeneous traffic (because almost everyone there is on a car), they don't cater to our local traffic which include pedestrians, cyclists, animal-driven carts and a large number of two wheelers using the same road as heavy motor vehicles.
Also, expanding and building flyovers on our urban roads without a firm policy related to land use pattern along these roads is an illogical exercise. Practically, one urban road should not be expanded more than four lanes because according to the rule of traffic equilibrium, people shift to alternate, under-utilised routes whenever there is congestion. More than four lane makes it difficult for a pedestrian to cross the road in the available 15 to 20 second time.
Let's have a look at a scenario when there is a normal road with residences alongside. The traffic starts increasing with time, so the road is widened. Now, due to this extra lane, the route attracts more people and besides meeting its own demand, it has to cater to additional 10 per cent traffic. Due to the increased vehicle movement, the house owners residing along the road find it lucrative to turn their dwellings into commercial spaces. This change in activity will attract 20 per cent more traffic and during the day time, one lane will be occupied for parking again causing congestion. Now, the next 'logical' step for our planners is to further expand the road or build a flyover. The problem is we keep on digging the road while the solution lies on its side. If there had been a freeze on change of land use, there would not have been any commercial activity and the traffic would have been manageable. In many European cities, the planners are doing just that: freezing the land use change and returning to narrower roads with lesser traffic.
Stress on public transport
The urban highways are being dismantled in several cities across the world. Seoul, the capital of South Korea, is a pioneer of this concept. In 2003, an expressway in the city's Central Business District (CBD) was demolished to reclaim a natural creek Cheonggyecheon. It was found that though the expressway served the mobility needs of the burgeoning car owners, it severely diminished the attractiveness of CBD which lost around 40,000 residents and 80,000 jobs in 10 years after the expressway was completed.
Besides the demolition of expressway, Seoul also implemented a car restriction policy and established designated several kilometers of median lanes for buses resulting in increased accessibility to public transport. According to the traffic surveys by Seoul Metropolitan Government, the number of vehicles entering or leaving 24 entry/exist points along the Cheonggyecheon in 2006 decreased by 43 per cent and 47 per cent, respectively, as compared to their 2002 baselines. The commercial area started attracting investors and property prices in the area increased. Improvement in air quality and reduction of noise pollution were additional advantages. Now, more than 50,000 people daily visit the creek for recreational activities. Similar success stories also exist in Paris, Berlin and US cities of New York, Portland, San Francisco and Milwaukee. Sadly, we are blindly borrowing from the infrastructure model of the US and other developed countries while they are junking it. Our cities need to lay more stress on public transport. A car's average household trip occupancy rate is 1.1 but it takes around 23 sq m, the same area which can host several cyclists. This will also help save the foreign reserve, one third of which is currently being spent on oil import.
In Delhi, the bus rapid transport (BRT) corridor has democratised the public space which had earlier been occupied by private vehicles. Besides offering faster service to bus users, it has brought around 1,200 new cyclists to the main road by offering them a separate lane. Scared of bigger motor vehicles, these cyclists were earlier taking internal, longer routes. The same BRT has been dubbed a failure by car users just because they are facing congestion. Owning a car is a luxury in our country and it should not automatically guarantee a right to freeway. The real benefits of BRT will be visible only if it's further expanded. People will switch to buses easing congestion and leading to improvement in air and noise pollution.
Example of Bogota in Colombia can be quoted here for better understanding. The city was facing heavy traffic congestion for which six urban highways (with toll plazas) and a metro system were proposed. However, Bagota's mayor decided to go for BRT and within six years of its implementation, traffic fatalities in the city reduced by 89 per cent while cycle use increased by five times because of traffic-free ways. The whole system was developed much faster and at a fraction of the cost of highways and metro system. A BRT corridor costs Rs 3-5 crore per km as compared to Rs 200 crore per km for a metro and can carry 30 per cent more passengers if designed properly. It's high time we understand these simple calculations and avoid falling into the trap of highly expensive expressways and flyovers just to ensure smooth ride to a small fraction of our population.
Navdeep Asija is a civil engineering research scholar working in the field of road safety.
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Eco cabs in Chandigarh
Chandigarh Admin to go ahead with multi-crore metro project
Friday, June 15, 2012
Decks cleared for Rs.100 crore Anandpur Sahib-Naina Devi ropeway
CHANDIGARH: Decks were cleared for Rs.100 crore Anandpur Sahib-Naina Devi ropeway, as Punjab Chief Secretary Mr. Rakesh Singh and his team of officers had a detailed meeting with Himachal Pardesh Chief Secretary Mr. Sudripta Roy and his team of officers in Simla, in which all the contentious issues coming in the way of this project, were sorted out.
According to an official spokesman, Punjab Chief Secretary Mr. Rakesh Singh accompanied by Principal Secretary, Tourism, Mr. Geetika Kalha, Secretary, Public Relations, Mr. Anirudh Tiwari and Chairman, PIDB, Mr. Anurag Agrawal had a detailed meeting with Himachal Pardesh Chief Secretary Mr. Sudripta Roy, Additional Chief Secretary, Mr. S.K. Dash, Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Mr. Deepak Sanan. It was discussed in the meeting that this important project that was conceived 8 years ago, could have not progressed as both participating states could not sort out some issues.
It was pointed out that this project was of great importance for Punjab as 90 per cent pilgrims to Mata Naina Devi were from Punjab. It was decided that both Governments would get the MoU for this project, approved from their respective cabinets and after that both states would sign the MoU.
The meeting decided that Punjab Infrastructure Development Board (PIDB)would be the executing agency for this 4 kilo meter long rope way that would be constructed at the cost of Rs.100 crore.
Fazilka-Abohar rail link to start soon
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
अबोहर-फाजिल्का रेल लाइन पर दौड़ने लगी गाड़ी
जागरण संवाददाता, फाजिल्का
इलाके के लोगों की दशकों पुरानी फाजिल्का-अबोहर के बीच रेलगाड़ी चलने की मांग अब जल्द पूरी होने की संभावना बन गई है। रूट पर नई रेललाइन पर मेंटीनेंस ट्रेन दौड़ने लगी है, जिससे आगामी कुछ दिन के भीतर इस ट्रैक यात्री गाड़ी चलाने के आस जग गई है।
उल्लेखनीय है कि करीब एक साल पहले इस रूट पर करीब 42 किलोमीटर लंबे रेल ट्रैक का निर्माण पूरा हो चुका है। हालांकि यह कार्य 2008 से पहले पूरा हो जाना चाहिए था लेकिन तीन साल की देरी के बाद आखिरकार जब जुलाई 2011 में काम पूरा हुआ तो तत्काल गाड़ियां चलने की उम्मीदें लगाई गई थी। लेकिन कमिश्नर रेलवे सेफ्टी द्वारा इस ट्रैक की सुरक्षा का जायजा लिए जाने में हुई देरी के चलते इस ट्रैक पर गाड़ियों का आवागमन शुरू नहीं हो सका। आखिरकार फाजिल्का व अबोहर के लोगों को इस ट्रैक पर गाड़ियां चलवाने के लिए संघर्ष का रास्ता अख्तियार करना पड़ा। अबोहर में रेल चलवाने के लिए पिछले 28 दिन से धरना जारी है तो फाजिल्का में भी पिछले 10 दिन से विभिन्न संगठन क्रमवार भूख हड़ताल पर बैठे हुए हैं। उसी का नतीजा है कि रेलवे ने इस ट्रैक पर गाड़ियां चलाने के लिए इसकी मेंटीनेंस तेज कर दी है। पिछले तीन दिन से एक मेंटीनेंस ट्रेन जिसमें एक इंजन व एक सवारी डिब्बा शामिल है रोजाना रेल ट्रैक पर आ जा रही है।
रेलवे सूत्रों के अनुसार रेलमार्ग की सुरक्षा का जायजा लिया जा रहा है। अगर कहीं कोई खराबी है तो मेंटीनेंस ट्रेन के सवारी डिब्बे में सवार वर्कर उसे ठीक कर रहे हैं। खासकर मानव रहित रेलवे फाटकों के रास्तों को बंद किया जा रहा है। दो दिन के भीतर मेंटीनेंस ट्रेन का स्टाफ इस लाइन को क्रास करने वाले करीब 40 रास्तों जहां फाटक नहीं है, को बंद कर चुका है।
वहीं पिछले दिनों फाजिल्का आए डीआरएम एनसी गोयल ने भी 31 जुलाई तक इस ट्रैक पर स्टाफ की भर्ती के बाद ट्रेन शुरू करने का वादा करके गए थे।
Saturday, June 9, 2012
Peace in the Pipeline
Getting gas via TAPI is not just a good business idea, it could herald peace in South Asia
By Narendra Taneja
| |
AS THE US prepares to quit military operations in Afghanistan, other stakeholders in the country such as India are, unsurprisingly, an anxious lot. Western powers believe that measures like strengthening the Afghan armed forces and building multiple revenue streams for Kabul will help stabilise the country that is now central to the New Central Asia Great Game. They seem confident that the measures would help keep Islamic fundamentalists, Taliban and the ISI at bay — hence, the unprecedented hurry to construct the long-planned Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India (TAPI) gas pipeline. Both Afghanistan and Pakistan will earn handsome amounts every year in transit fees, besides access to jobs and gas.
The 1,735 km pipeline, with a total gas capacity of 90 million cubic metres per day (MMSCMD), will follow the ancient trading route to India, passing through Herat and Kandahar in Afghanistan, Quetta and Multan in Pakistan, before landing in Fazilka, Punjab. On completion in 2017, India is supposed to receive 38 MMSCMD of gas from the transnational pipeline.
TAPI promoters will begin international roadshows in August to lure investors and new consortium partners, mostly from countries perceived friendly by the West and, I hope, India. With more sceptics in the West than in the East, the promoters, which include New Delhibased PSU GAIL (India) Ltd, are predicted to face a tough scrutiny of the project, particularly on the issue of the pipeline's security in battletorn Afghanistan and in the Balochistan region where Pakistan's own domestic gas pipelines are bombed regularly by local separatists.
However, western powers claim they have new technologies in place that will take care of such concerns. Sure, some concerns may be overblown, but there is no doubt that TAPI will have to live with the intimidating title of the most threatened energy pipeline in the world for a long time to come. But the risk is worth taking since perceived gains in terms of building a new South Asia far outweigh apparent threats. Energy diplomats argue that TAPI can be almost fully protected by keeping it underground and by wiring it up with new-generation computer and satellite-controlled devices to report and repair any terrorist attack on an almost real-time basis. Helicoptermounted patrol and repair teams, preferably manned by locals — which would also bring in intelligence against any mischief involving locals — will add an additional element of safety.
|
Anyway, GAIL is confident of easily making up for any sudden supply disruption from the pipeline by pumping in more gas from its own sources and, if required, by using imported gas. The real worry is what happens if some rogue elements within the Pakistani armed forces or ISI lend support to the Taliban within their own country and in Afghanistan to mount a full-scale and dramatic annihilation of the pipeline, which, when completed, would probably become the shining symbol of the growing India-Pakistan economic cooperation on the one hand and of the deepening India- Afghanistan bonds on the other. It is no secret that hardliners of all hues in both Pakistan and Afghanistan are against the TAPI pipeline.
TAPI has the potential to be a game-changer if it is projected more as an economic cooperation initiative of the four countries involved than a geopolitical one aided by outsiders. If India has an opportunity to change the course of history by partnering in a project like TAPI, then we must avail it with full zeal and enthusiasm. TAPI can change the future of our entire region by creating a new constituency of vested interests and stakeholders in the four countries, but more importantly, in Pakistan. They may prove to be the catalysts for a new South Asia.
The US may be behind fast-tracking TAPI, but it may eventually serve India and Pakistan more than any other country. But TAPI alone would not be enough. India needs to show equal enthusiasm for the 2,775 km Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI) gas pipeline (now in progress till Pakistan), which is often called the original "peace pipeline". The US may have its own reasons for opposing IPI, but it is for Delhi to decide what is good for its 1.21 billion energy consumers. We need Iranian gas and, equally importantly, we need to strengthen energy ties with Iran, which has been our civilisational partner for ages.
Narendra Taneja is an Expert on energy and geopolitical issues.
http://www.tehelka.com/story_main53.asp?filename=Op160612Peace.asp